Quick Navigation
Ever think about some of the worst graphics cards ever made? Here are some of these cards that we will examine in this article. This information is based on our own personal experiences with these chips along with information we obtained from a variety of people who have already tested these products.
There’s no need to throw away any of these graphics cards if they’re working fine for you.
We should start with the older generation Intel integrated graphics chipset before we dive into the list. At this point, we are not talking about Intel UHD 600 Series.
List Of Best To Worst GPUs
If you have the hard-earned cash with you, you should stay away from the following worst GPU.
1- Nvidia Titan X: It’s Not All About Names
The GTX Titan X and Pascal Titan X are two Titan models offered by Nvidia. Here we are talking about the Pascal Titan X.
As a starting point, everything that is called “Titan” isn’t necessarily a high-performance machine. Having 12GB of DDR5 VRAM makes this graphics card powerful for any task.
With a graphics card with more VRAM, you can play games at 1440p. Nevertheless, it is possible to play games at higher resolutions for less money. We might say the price point of Nvidia Titan X in 2022 is not fair at all.
DLSS 2.0 and ray tracing are two premium features available on graphics cards for over $1000.
It wouldn’t be wise to spend over $1000 on a Titan X “Pascal” just to get 12GB DDR5 VRAM. As compared to Titan X, GTX 1660 Super or GTX 1080 Ti perform far more efficiently in gaming. Again, do not fall for Nvidia’s claims about this graphics card.
2- Amd 5450 – A Bad Entry-Level GPU
Even though AMD HD 5450 graphics cards are energy-efficient, they are not the best performers. Neither gaming nor HD video streaming is recommended for this product due to its performance.
There are several reasons why HD 5450 performs poorly, including an outdated 1 GB GDDR3 video memory, lower base clock speed, etc. It is more popular to buy this card since it is cheaper and eliminates the need for integrated chipsets.
You should not expect more from this graphics card if your expectations are higher. Games cannot be played at 1080p settings and Netflix movies cannot be viewed at 4K quality with this GPU.
We’ve found this to be one of the worst graphics cards on our low-budget PCs in the past. It was surprising to find that the HD 5450 could play some 15-year-old games at 720p.
Compared to Intel’s older integrated chipsets, this GPU performed better. The UHD Graphics Series performs better than HD 5450 when compared to Intel’s UHD Graphics Series when it comes to GPU-intensive tasks.
Nvidia GT 1030 or GTX 1050 graphics cards perform better when you spend more money.
3- Amd R9 285 – An Underperformer
AMD has pulled out another product for you. In spite of AMD’s recent improvements, it appears their R9-Series GPUs did not have enough juice to defeat Nvidia’s latest cards.
Since it is so affordable, many people still choose this approximately 8-year-old graphics card. In the year 2022, the 2GB VRAM on the R9-285 is still questionable if you are planning to buy this card for playing famous titles of its time.
When you have a lower VRAM, you are limited to 720p settings when playing most games. Currently, the R9 285 is 20% faster than the Nvidia GTX 970, released in the same month and year.
You should not buy this card if you are a hardcore gamer. Additionally, you can have a graphics card if you just want to edit photos and watch movies at a higher resolution. Although it’s a fair price on eBay or Amazon, we think it’s not the right card for your PC.
4- Nvidia Geforce 210 – It’s Slow
Nvidia’s latest entry-level cards aren’t worth comparing with the older GeForce Series cards. But most people are lured in by the lower price, and this is what Nvidia GeForce 210 offers you.
Our comparison won’t be with entry-level GPUs of the newest generation, since it’s not comparable. In regards to modern games and graphical applications, however, the performance of this GPU is somewhat slow.
For games like CS: GO and PUBG, most people opt for this lower-end card. It doesn’t mean a cheaper card can’t play PUBG, Fortnite, or CS: GO just because you’re going after a cheaper card
On Nvidia GeForce 210, we tested CS: GO at the lowest settings (640×480). Our frame rate didn’t reach more than 20fps even at these lowest settings. Therefore, if you plan to play FPS games with this card, stay away from it.
In this case, the slower performance could be related to the GPU’s lack of base clock speed and 1GB of DDR3 memory. Pairing it with a current-generation CPU could be the most influential factor behind this. It is possible to bottleneck performance when using an outdated graphics card with a current-generation CPU.
Conclusion
As a result, you will be able to determine which graphics cards are the worst in the market. It is important to keep in mind that these are our own experiences with these GPUs. Depending on what people have experienced with these graphics cards, you will find different opinions about them. Perhaps we should start from the RTX 3050 Ti on this list since there are more GPUs that we might add later on.
